Quran and Social Sciences

Quran and Social Sciences

Euphemism and the Management of Social Tensions in the Holy Qur’an: A Rhetorical and Pedagogical Reading

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Studies, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood , Shahrood, Iran (Corresponding Author)
2 Master's Student, Quran and Hadith Studies (Quranic Teachings), University of Quranic Sciences and Teachings, Shahroud, Iran
Abstract
Euphemistic expression in the Holy Qur’an is not merely a linguistic feature or literary device; rather, it constitutes a powerful and purposeful discursive strategy for preventing identity-based fractures, promoting social cohesion, repairing human relationships, and managing social tensions. Employing a descriptive-analytical method and a rhetorical-pedagogical approach to Qur’anic verses, this study demonstrates that the Qur’an uses euphemistic strategies when addressing sensitive, tension-laden, and challenging situations. These include human error and lapses, opposition, afflictions and painful events, legal rulings and penalties, family relations, collective dialogue, the restoration of communicative bonds, and eschatological warnings and threats. Direct reference to such matters may impede constructive communication, undermine the dignity of the addressee, and generate tension, confrontation, and anxiety. In such contexts, the Qur’an employs a range of discursive mechanisms, including distinguishing an individual’s identity from the wrongful act by referring to a “lapse” rather than “disobedience”; suspending hasty judgment through conditional constructions and the reassignment of responsibility; creating rhetorical distance through indirect analogy; shifting the semantic horizon from annihilation to the taking of the soul and return; emphasizing religious brotherhood in the context of retribution; employing gradual sequencing and linguistically mitigated prohibitions in the reform of family relations; and formulating warnings through conditional and multilayered structures. These strategies restrain verbal and emotional violence, preserve the dignity and status of the addressee, foster internal moral commitment, and create the conditions necessary for sustained interaction, gradual reform and transformation, and social cohesion and solidarity. The findings indicate that euphemistic expression lies at the heart of a Qur’anic discursive transformation from the logic of domination and confrontation to that of invitation and solidarity. Rooted in the tension-filled circumstances of the Qur’an’s revelation, this approach offers a preventive and practical model for managing human relationships in the contemporary world.
Keywords
Subjects

The Holy Qurʾan
1.     Bāqirī, Khosrow. (1390 SH.). Huviyyat, Tarbiyat va Maʿnā-yi Zindigī. Tehran: SAMT.
2.     Chegīnī, Rizvan; Ghaffārī, Mujtabā; Muḥammadī, Rūḥullah. (1401 SH.). “Taḥlīl-i Oslūb-i Khiṭāb dar Qurʾān va Khuṭab-i Nahj al-Balāgheh.” Faslnāmeh-yi ʿIlmī-Pazhūhishī-yi Pazhūhish-hā-yi Nahj al-Balāgheh, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 99–129.
3.     Fan, Zhiqiang. (2006). “The Mechanism of Euphemism: A Cognitive Linguistic Interpretation”. US-China Foreign Language, Volume 4, No.7 Serial No. 34.
4.     Giddens, Anthony. (1393 SH.). Jāmiʿeh va Huviyyat. Trans: Manūchehr Ṣabūrī. Tehran: Ney Publications.
5.     Ḥusaynī Hamadānī, Sayyid Muḥammad. (1404 AH). Anwār-i Dirakhshān. Ed: Muḥammad Bāqir Bahbūdī. Tehran: Kitābfurūshī-yi Luṭfī.
6.     Ibn ʿĀshūr, Muḥammad ibn Ṭāhir. (n.d.). al-Taḥrīr wa-l-Tanwīr. 1st ed. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Tārīkh.
7.     Ibn Fāris, Aḥmad ibn Fāris. (1416 AH). Muʿjam Maqāyīs al-Lughah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
8.     Javadi Amoli, ʿAbdullah. (1395 SH.). Tafsīr-i Tasnīm. Qom: Markaz-i Nashr-i Isrāʾ.
9.     Jurjānī, ʿAbd al-Qāhir. (1404 AH). Dalāʾil al-Iʿjāz. Cairo: Maktabat al-Khānjī.
10.  Khalīl ibn Aḥmad al-Farāhīdī. (1409 AH). Kitāb al-ʿAyn. Qom: Hijrat Publications.
11.  Khurramshāhī, Bahāʾ al-Dīn. (1389 SH.). Dānishnāmeh-yi Qurʾān va Qurʾān-Pazhūhī. Tehran: Nashr-i Dūstān.
12.  Makārim Shīrāzī, Nāṣir, et al. (1374 SH.). Tafsīr-i Nemūnaeh. 1st ed. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyyah.
13.  Mawlānī-Niyā, ʿIzzatullah. (1383 SH.). Asālīb-i Bayānī-yi Qurʾān-i Karīm. 1st ed. Tehran: Farhang-i Sabz.
14.  Moʿīn, Muḥammad. (1386 SH.). Farhang-i Moʿīn. 4th ed. Tehran: Adnā Publications.
15.  Motahhari, Morteza. (1380 SH.). Taʿlīm va Tarbiyat dar Islām. Tehran: Ṣadrā Publications.
16.  Mudarrisī, Muḥammad Jawād. (1390 SH.). Balāghat va Zabān-i Qurʾān. Qom: Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy.
17.  Ostovār, Elhām. (1400 SH.). Naqd va Barresī-yi Chegūnigī-yi Inʿikās-i Ḥusn-i Taʿbīr-hā-yi Qurʾān-i Karīm dar Ḥīṭeh-yi Akhlāq-i Jinsī dar Tarjumeh-hā-yi Fārsī-yi Muʿāṣir. Shiraz: University of Shiraz, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies.
18.  Qurashī, Sayyid ʿAli Akbar. (1371 SH.). Qāmūs-i Qurʾān. 6th ed. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyyah.
19.  Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī, Ḥusayn ibn Muḥammad. (1412 AH). al-Dharīʿah ilā Makārim al-Sharīʿah. Cairo: Dār al-Salām.
20.  Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī, Ḥusayn ibn Muḥammad. (1412 AH). Mufradāt Alfāẓ al-Qurʾān. Damascus: Dār al-Qalam.
21.  Rawson, Hugh. (1981). A Dictionary of Euphemisms and Other Doubletalk. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc.
22.  Rezaei Isfahani, Mohammad Ali. (1387 SH.). Tafsīr-i Qurʾān-i Mehr. 1st ed. Qom: Pazhūhish-hā-yi Tafsīr va ʿUlūm-i Qurʾānī.
23.  Ṣafavī, Kūrush. (1394 SH.). Darāmadī bar Maʿnā-shināsī. Tehran: SAMT.
24.  Shāhsvandī, Zūhre; Khānehzād, Omīd. (1391 SH.). “Zabān-shināsī-yi Khiṭāb dar Qurʾān.” Pazhūhish-hā-yi Qurʾānī, 18(2), pp. 82–98.
25.  Shamīsā, Sīrūs. (1374 SH.). Kulliyyāt-i Sabk-shināsī. 3rd ed. Tehran: Firdaws Publications.
26.  Sharīʿatī, ʿAli. (1379 SH.). Bāzgasht bih Khvīshtan. Tehran: Ḥusayniyyah-yi Irshād.
27.  Sharīf al-Raḍī, Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥusayn. (1414 AH). Nahj al-Balāghah. 1st ed. Qom: Hijrat Publications.
28.  Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. (1408 AH). al-Itqān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
29.  Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Sayyid Muḥammad Ḥusayn. (1374 SH.). al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Qom: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī.
30.  Ṭabrisī, Faḍl ibn Ḥasan. (1372 SH.). Majmaʿ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. 3rd ed. Tehran: Nāṣir Khusrow.
31.  Ṭāhā ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. (2000). Suʾāl al-Akhlāq: Musāhameh fī al-Naqd al-Akhlāqī li-l-Ḥadātheh. Casablanca: al-Markaz al-Thaqāfī al-ʿArabī.
32.  Zamakhsharī, Maḥmūd ibn ʿUmar. (1407 AH). al-Kashshāf ʿan Ḥaqāʾiq Ghawāmiḍ al-Tanzīl. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
33.  Zarkashī, Badr al-Dīn Muḥammad. (1382 SH.). al-Burhān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān. Tehran: Amīr Kabīr Publications.
34.  Zarqānī, Muḥammad ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm. (1385 SH.). al-ʿIrfān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān. Trans: Muḥsin Ārmīn. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Volume 6, Issue 1 - Serial Number 21
Winter 2026
Pages 164-199

  • Receive Date 22 March 2026
  • Revise Date 01 June 2026
  • Accept Date 24 July 2026