Quran and Social Sciences

Quran and Social Sciences

Qur’anic Strategies for Strengthening Social Resilience against Enemy Cognitive Warfare

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Exegesis and Quranic Sciences, University of Quranic Sciences and Teachings, Qom, Iran
2 Level 4, Comparative Exegesis, Hazrat Khadija (SA) Specialized Seminary, Babol, Iran (Corresponding Author)
Abstract
This study examines Qur’anic strategies for strengthening social resilience in the face of the enemy’s cognitive warfare. Its central research question concerns which patterns derived from the text of the Holy Qur’an can provide a foundation for reinforcing social stability and cohesion under the complex conditions of the contemporary world, in which adversaries employ media tools and psychological operations to influence the perceptions, beliefs, and behavior of Islamic societies. The significance of the study lies in the fact that cognitive warfare, unlike conventional warfare, targets the collective mind and identity. Countering such warfare therefore requires profound and sustainable strategies grounded in authentic religious sources. Employing a descriptive-analytical method, the study examines Qur’anic verses related to such concepts as resistance, patience, insight, awareness, unity, and social cohesion. It first clarifies the key concepts associated with social resilience and cognitive warfare and then classifies and analyzes selected verses in accordance with these conceptual categories. To enhance the accuracy and validity of the analysis, the study draws on authoritative Shi‘i and Sunni exegetical sources, including al-Mīzān, Tasnīm, Fī Ẓilāl al-Qurʾan, and Majmaʿ al-Bayān, as well as other relevant exegetical works and scholarly studies. This approach ensures that the interpretation of the selected verses is based on a systematic and in-depth understanding of the Qur’anic text. The findings indicate that the Holy Qur’an presents an integrated and multilayered set of strategies for confronting cognitive threats. These strategies not only strengthen individuals against psychological and propagandistic pressures but also contribute to the formation of a resilient, informed, and cohesive society. The findings classify these strategies into four principal levels: psychological-affective, cognitive, behavioral, and institutional-social. At the psychological-affective level, the Qur’an reinforces individuals’ inner stability by emphasizing patience, trust in God, hope in divine assistance, and tranquility of the heart, thereby increasing their resistance to anxiety and the enemy’s negative insinuations. At the cognitive level, the Qur’an emphasizes insight, reflection, contemplation of the divine signs, and the rejection of blind imitation. These principles enhance individuals’ capacity for discernment and reduce their vulnerability to distortion, misinformation, and doubt. At the behavioral level, the Qur’an presents practical models of resistance, jihad, enjoining what is right, and forbidding what is wrong, thereby encouraging active and responsible participation in society. At the institutional-social level, it emphasizes unity, solidarity, adherence to religious authority, and the avoidance of division. These elements play a fundamental role in preserving social cohesion and neutralizing the enemy’s divisive strategies. Overall, the proposed model demonstrates that social resilience in Qur’anic thought is not merely an individual or temporary response, but a dynamic, integrated, and multilevel system encompassing the various dimensions of human existence and social organization. By linking faith, awareness, action, and social institutions, this system provides a comprehensive foundation for preserving the identity, cohesion, and stability of the Islamic ummah in the face of cognitive warfare. It may therefore serve as a strategic framework for cultural and social policymaking in Islamic societies.
Keywords
Subjects

The Holy Qurʾan
Nahj al-Balāghah
1.     Fakhr al-Rāzī, Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar. (1420 AH). Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī.
2.     Fayḍ Kāshānī, Mullā Muḥsin. (1415 AH). Tafsīr al-Ṣāfī. Tehran: Maktabat al-Ṣadr.
3.     Folke, Carl. (2006). “Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social-Ecological Systems Analyses.” Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267.
4.     Ḥājīzādeh, Sīrūs. (1401 SH.). “Tabyīn-i Zaminehī, Naẓarī, Mafhūmī va Kārburdī-yi Jang-i Shinākhtī.” Quarterly Journal of Bāzī-yi Jang, year 5, no. 10, pp. 103–143.
5.     Ḥakīmī, Muḥammad Riḍā; Ḥakīmī, Muḥammad; Ḥakīmī, ʿAli. (1360 SH.). al-Ḥayāt. Qom: Daftar-i Nashr-i Farhang-i Islāmī.
6.     Inglehart, Ronald, & Welzel, Christian. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, And Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press.
7.     ʿIrāqī, ʿAbdullah; Bidgoli, Muḥammad; Rajabī Dihbarzūʾī, Aṣghar. (1401 SH.). “Vākāvī-yi Ahdāf-i Jang-i Shinākhtī-yi Dushman va Rāhkārhā-yi Tāvānī-yi Muqābileh bā Ān bā Taʾkīd bar Āmūzeh-hā-yi Qurʾān.” Faslnāmeh-yi ʿIlmī-yi Muṭālaʿāt-i Difāʿ-i Muqaddas, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 143–162.
8.     ʿIrāqī, ʿAbdullah. (1401 SH.). Mafāhīm-i Novīn-i Jang-i Tarkībī va Shinākhtī. Tehran: Muʾassaseh-yi Āyandehpazhūhī-yi Rāhburdī.
9.     Īyāzī, Sayyid ʿAli Naqī. (1402 SH.). “Dīndārī va Tāvānī-yi Ijtimāʿī dar Āmūzeh-hā-yi Qurʾānī.” Faslnāmeh-yi Mishkāt, no. 74, pp. 64–87.
10.  Jaʿfarī, Muḥammad Taqī. (1363 SH.). Tarjumeh va Tafsīr-i Nahj al-Balāghah. Tehran: Daftar-i Nashr-i Farhang-i Islāmī.
11.  Javadi Amoli, ʿAbdullah. (1381 SH.). Tafsīr-i Tasnīm. Qom: Markaz-i Nashr-i Isrāʾ.
12.  Javānī, Muḥammad. (1402 SH.). ʿUlūm-i Shinākhtī dar Jang-i Shinākhtī. Tehran: Nashr-i Navāndīshān.
13.  Javānī, Muḥammad. (1402 SH.). ʿUlūm-i Shinākhtī va Qudrat-i Narm dar Olgu-yi Difāʿī-yi Inqilāb-i Islāmī. Tehran: Nashr-i Ṣiyānat.
14.  Kahneman, Daniel. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
15.  Kazāzī, Mīr Jalāl al-Dīn. (1395 SH.). Tafsīr-i Mawḍūʿī-yi Qurʾān-i Karīm. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Asāṭīr.
16.  Luthan, David. (2014). Jāmiʿeh-shināsī-yi Dīn: Sarmāyeh-yi Ijtimāʿī-yi Farāgīr dar Jāmiʿeh-yi Dīnī. Trans: Ḥasan Muḥaddithī. Tehran: Nashr-i Ney.
17.  Makārim Shīrāzī, Nāṣir. (1377 SH.). Tafsīr-i Nemūneh. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyyah.
18.  Miṣbāḥ Yazdī, Muḥammad Taqī. (1389 SH.). Jāmiʿeh va Tārīkh az Dīdgāh-i Qurʾān. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute.
19.  Motahhari, Morteza. (1370 SH.). Majmūʿeh-yi Āthār. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Ṣadrā.
20.  Motahhari, Morteza. (1375 SH.). Sayrī dar Nahj al-Balāghah. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Ṣadrā.
21.  Norris, Fran H, Stevens, Susan P, Pfefferbaum, Betty, Wyche, Karen F, & Pfefferbaum, Rose L. (2008). “Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy For Disaster Readiness.” American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 127–150.
22.  Pezhmānfar, Naṣrullāh. (1394 SH.). Jang-i Ravānī va Tarfand-hā-yi Ān. Qom: Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy.
23.  Qurṭubī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad al-Anṣārī. (1405 AH). al-Jāmiʿ li-Aḥkām al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah.
24.  Seligman, Martin E. P. (2018). The Hope Circuit: A Psychologist’s Journey from Helplessness to Optimism. Public Affairs.
25.  Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Sayyid Muḥammad Ḥusayn. (1374 SH.). al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Qom: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī.
26.  Ṭabrisī, Faḍl ibn Ḥasan. (1372 SH.). Majmaʿ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Tehran: Nāṣir Khusraw.
Zamakhsharī, Maḥmūd ibn ʿUmar. (1407 AH). al-Kashshāf ʿan Ḥaqāʾiq Ghawāmiḍ al-Tanzīl. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿArabī

  • Receive Date 07 September 2025
  • Revise Date 25 October 2025
  • Accept Date 24 February 2026